0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessDNA methylation patterns are altered in numerous diseases and often correlate with clinically relevant information such as disease subtypes, prognosis and drug response. With suitable assays and after validation in large cohorts, such associations can be exploited for clinical diagnostics and personalized treatment decisions. Here we describe the results of a community-wide benchmarking study comparing the performance of all widely used methods for DNA methylation analysis that are compatible with routine clinical use. We shipped 32 reference samples to 18 laboratories in seven different countries. Researchers in those laboratories collectively contributed 21 locus-specific assays for an average of 27 predefined genomic regions, as well as six global assays. We evaluated assay sensitivity on low-input samples and assessed the assays' ability to discriminate between cell types. Good agreement was observed across all tested methods, with amplicon bisulfite sequencing and bisulfite pyrosequencing showing the best all-round performance. Our technology comparison can inform the selection, optimization and use of DNA methylation assays in large-scale validation studies, biomarker development and clinical diagnostics.
Christoph Bock, Florian Halbritter, Francisco javier García Carmona, Sascha Tierling, Paul Datlinger, Yassen Assenov, María Berdasco, Anke Bergmann, Keith Booher, Florence Busato, Mihaela Campan, Christina Dahl, Christina M. Dahmcke, Dinh Diep, Agustín F. Fernández, Clarissa Gerhäuser, Andrea Haake, Katharina Heilmann, Thomas Holcomb, Dianna Hussmann, Mitsuteru Ito, Ruth Kläver, Martin Kreutz, Marta Kulis, Virginia López, Shalima S. Nair, Dirk S. Paul, Nongluk Plongthongkum, Wenjia Qu, Ana C. Queirós, Frank Reinicke, Guido Sauter, Thorsten Schlomm, Aaron L. Statham, Clare Stirzaker, Ruslan Strogantsev, Rocío G. Urdinguio, Kimberly Walter, Dieter Weichenhan, Daniel J. Weisenberger, Stephan Beck, Susan J. Clark, Manel Esteller, Anne C. Ferguson‐Smith, Mario F. Fraga, Per Guldberg, Lise Lotte Hansen, Peter W. Laird, José I. Martı́n-Subero, Anders O.H. Nygren, Ralf Peist, Christoph Plass, David S. Shames, Reiner Siebert, Xueguang Sun, Jörg Tost, Jörn Walter, Kun Zhang (2016). Quantitative comparison of DNA methylation assays for biomarker development and clinical applications. , 34(7), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3605.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2016
Authors
58
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3605
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free AccessYes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration