0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessTeachers’ behaviour is a key factor that influences students’ motivation. Many theoretical models have tried to explain this influence, with one of the most thoroughly researched being self-determination theory (SDT). We used a Delphi method to create a classification of teacher behaviours consistent with SDT. This is useful because SDT-based interventions have been widely used to improve educational outcomes. However, these interventions contain many components. Reliably classifying and labelling those components is essential for implementation, reproducibility, and evidence synthesis. We used an international expert panel (N = 34) to develop this classification system. We started by identifying behaviours from existing literature, then refined labels, descriptions, and examples using the experts’ input. Next, these experts iteratively rated the relevance of each behaviour to SDT, the psychological need that each behaviour influenced, and its likely effect on motivation. To create a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of behaviours, experts nominated overlapping behaviours that were redundant, and suggested new ones missing from the classification. After three rounds, the expert panel agreed upon 57 teacher motivational behaviours that were consistent with SDT. For most behaviours (77%), experts reached consensus on both the most relevant psychological need and influence on motivation. Our classification system provides a comprehensive list of teacher motivational behaviours and consistent terminology in how those behaviours are labelled. Researchers and practitioners designing interventions could use these behaviours to design interventions, to reproduce interventions, to assess whether these behaviours moderate intervention effects, and could focus new research on areas where experts disagreed. Educational impact and implications statementThe things teachers do in class have an important influence on their students’ motivation, engagement, and learning. This study uses an international expert panel to identify the teacher behaviours most likely to influence motivation—specifically, teacher behaviours that increase the more healthy, autonomous motivation that comes from within students. This list of behaviours, agreed upon by the experts, could be used by teachers trying to improve their practice, policymakers trying to scale interventions, and researchers trying to assess which behaviours best predict student outcomes.
Asghar Ahmadi, Michael Noetel, Philip D. Parker, Richard M. Ryan, Nikos Ntoumanis, Johnmarshall Reeve, Mark R. Beauchamp, Theresa Dicke, Alexander Seeshing Yeung, Malek Ahmadi, Kimberley J. Bartholomew, Thomas K. F. Chiu, Thomas Curran, Gökçe Erturan, Barbara Flunger, Christina M. Frederick, John Mark Froiland, David González‐Cutre, Leen Haerens, Lucas M. Jeno, Andre Koka, Christa Krijgsman, Jody L. Langdon, Rhiannon Lee White, David Litalien, David R. Lubans, John Mahoney, Ma. Jenina N. Nalipay, Erika A. Patall, Dana Perlman, Eleanor Quested, Sascha Schneider, Martyn Standage, Kim Stroet, Damien Tessier, Cecilie Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, Henri Tilga, Diego Itiberê Cunha Vasconcellos, Chris Lonsdale (2022). A Classification System for Teachers’ Motivational Behaviours Recommended in Self-Determination Theory Interventions. , DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/4vrym.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Preprint
Year
2022
Authors
39
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/4vrym
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access