0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessBackground Recent epidemiologic evidence points to the health risks of prolonged sitting, that are independent of physical activity, but few papers have reported the descriptive epidemiology of sitting in population studies with adults. Purpose This paper reports the prevalence of “high sitting time” and its correlates in an international study in 20 countries. Methods Representative population samples from 20 countries were collected 2002–2004, and a question was asked on usual weekday hours spent sitting. This question was part of the International Prevalence Study, using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The sitting measure has acceptable reliability and validity. Daily sitting time was compared among countries, and by age group, gender, educational attainment, and physical activity. Results Data were available for 49,493 adults aged 18–65 years from 20 countries. The median reported sitting time was 300 minutes/day, with an interquartile range of 180–480 minutes. Countries reporting the lowest amount of sitting included Portugal, Brazil, and Colombia (medians ≤180 min/day), whereas adults in Taiwan, Norway, Hong Kong, Saudi Arabia, and Japan reported the highest sitting times (medians ≥360 min/day). In adjusted analyses, adults aged 40–65 years were significantly less likely to be in the highest quintile for sitting than adults aged 18–39 years (AOR=0.796), and those with postschool education had higher sitting times compared with those with high school or less education (OR=1.349). Physical activity showed an inverse relationship, with those reporting low activity on the IPAQ three times more likely to be in the highest-sitting quintile compared to those reporting high physical activity. Conclusions Median sitting time varied widely across countries. Assessing sitting time is an important new area for preventive medicine, in addition to assessing physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Population surveys that monitor lifestyle behaviors should add measures of sitting time to physical activity surveillance. Moreover, the use of objective measures to capture the spectrum of sedentary (sitting) and physical activity behaviors is encouraged, particularly in low- and middle-income countries commencing new surveillance activities.
Adrian Bauman, Barbara E. Ainsworth, James Sallis, María Hagströmer, Cora L. Craig, Fiona Bull, Michael Pratt, Kamalesh Venugopal, Josephine Y. Chau, Michael Sjöstróm (2011). The Descriptive Epidemiology of Sitting. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(2), pp. 228-235, DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.003.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2011
Authors
10
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
DOI
10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.003
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access