0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessObjective: The aim of the study was to investigate daily clinical pratice for office blood pressure (BP) measurement among the centers of the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA). Design and method: The working group on ambulatory BP monitoring of SIIA developed an online questionnaire on daily clinical practise for office BP measurement. The questionnaire consisted of 26 questions regarding equipment available for BP detection in office, the procedure followed to detect it, usual practise followed to confirm the diagnosis of office hypertension. The survey was spread by an e-mail with a direct link to the questionnaire on a web platform. Results: We obtained 72 answers (rate response 60.5%). 95.6% stated the use of a validated device: 65.3% used an automatic oscillometric device, almost one third (27.8%) an aneroid device, while 6.9% used a manual device with a digital column. The majority of the offices had standard and large cuffs, while only half had small and extra large cuffs. In 70.4% of the centers BP was measured by the physicians at the time of the visit, in 15.5% by a nurse, before the entrance of the physician, in 12.7% again by the nurse but in the presence of the doctor, only 1.4% performed unattended measurements. The majority tested BP in two different positions supine or sitting and standing positions, but there was a quarter of centers that detected BP only in one position. Less than half performed 3 BP measurements, the majority performed one or two detections and less than 20% performed 3 measurements only in case of disagreement between the first and second one. To confirm the diagnosis of office hypertension the majority suggested home (40.3%) or ambulatory (30.6%) BP, 25.0% performed a tailored decision, 2.7% planned a new office BP evaluation, while 1.4% confirmed the diagnosis at the first assessment. Conclusions: Despite a correct office BP measurement is mandatory to detect hypertesion, as clearly indicated by guidelines, our results highlighted an eterogenous condition through the Italian territory
Francesca Saladini, F Albini, Antonino Di Guardo, Stefano Omboni, Gian Paolo Fra, Giuliano Tocci, Gianfranco Parati, María Lorenza Muiesan, Paolo Palatini, Grzegorz Bilo (2025). SURVEY ON OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT DAILY PRACTICE IN THE HYPERTENSIVE CENTERS OF THE ITALIAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION. , 43(Suppl 1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001115944.13828.99.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
10
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001115944.13828.99
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access