0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThe findings of the study suggested that the results of meta-analyses could be reliably replicated if the original data or analytic code, or both, could be obtained, or if the necessary data were accessible in the review. Few systematic reviewers responded to requests to share data or code. Making data files and analytic code publicly available will facilitate future investigations of reproducibility.
Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Joanne E. McKenzie, Zainab Alqaidoom, Daniel G. Hamilton, David Moher, Matthew J. Page (2025). Reproducibility of meta-analytic results in systematic reviews of interventions: meta-research study. , 4(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-002024.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
6
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-002024
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access
.webp){kind=avatar}
