Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Rehabilitation after bone marrow transplant compared with usual care to improve patient outcomes (REBOOT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
en
2025

Rehabilitation after bone marrow transplant compared with usual care to improve patient outcomes (REBOOT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2025
Vol 25 (1)
Vol. 25
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13898-3

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Amit Khot
Amit Khot

Institution not specified

Verified
Linda Denehy
Shaza Abo
Christopher T.V. Swain
+40 more

Abstract

Abstract Background Haematological cancer affects more than 1.3 million people around the world annually and accounted for almost 800,000 deaths globally in 2020. The number of patients with these cancers undergoing bone marrow transplant is increasing. Of note, this intensive treatment is associated with complex and multifactorial side effects, often impacting nutritional status, physical functioning and overall health-related quality of life. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of an eight-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention compared with usual care on the physical function domain of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3) in patients with haematological cancer following bone marrow transplant. Methods This is a multisite, pragmatic two-arm parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) with stratified randomisation, powered for superiority, recruiting 170 participants at 30 days following either allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplant (ACTRN12622001071718). Recruitment sites include three Australian university affiliated teaching hospitals. Participants are eligible if aged ≥ 18 years, treated for haematological cancer with allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplant and can walk independently. The intervention group will receive eight weeks of twice weekly telehealth-based exercise classes, an initial and follow up dietetics consult, post exercise protein supplements, and a home-based physical activity program, all with embedded behaviour change strategies. The primary outcome is patient reported physical function measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3. Secondary outcomes include other domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30, fatigue, physical function, physical activity levels, frailty, body composition, sarcopenia and nutrition assessment. We will also undertake a health economic analysis alongside the trial and a process evaluation exploring intervention fidelity, causal mechanisms as well as contextual influences through qualitative enquiry. Discussion The REBOOT trial will add RCT-evidence from a rigorously conducted, statistically powered multi-site trial to existing limited knowledge on the effects of multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for people with haematological cancer. If effectiveness is supported, then implementation of rehabilitation into care pathways for people having bone marrow transplant can be considered. Trial registration ACTRN12622001071718 prospectively registered 03/08/2022, last updated 08/03/2024.

How to cite this publication

Linda Denehy, Shaza Abo, Christopher T.V. Swain, Camille E. Short, Nicole Kiss, Amit Khot, Eric T. Wong, Duncan Purtill, Clare O’Donnell, Marlena Klaic, Catherine L. Granger, Michelle Tew, Tim Spelman, Vinícius Cavalheri, Lara Edbrooke, Ailish Doyle, Anna Beaumont, Andrew S. Mackie, Belinda Herrmann, Bianca Ukovic, Cynthia McRae, Danika Carty, Emily Calton, Fiona Coll, Gerald F. Yeo, Jill Brooks, J. Graeme Houston, Kate Kaegi, Kristen Capron, Lucy J. Troup, Marcus J. Adair, Michelle Kendell, Mark Whitaker, Morgan Smith, Paul Gittings, Rachel McLean, Robert J. Dempsey, Rebecca C. Fry, Sangeeta Sathyanath, Stacey Haughton, Stephanie Versaci, Talia Clohessy, Thomas Phyland (2025). Rehabilitation after bone marrow transplant compared with usual care to improve patient outcomes (REBOOT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. , 25(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13898-3.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2025

Authors

43

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13898-3

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access