0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessScientific theories reflect some of humanity's greatest epistemic achievements. The best theories motivate us to search for discoveries, guide us towards successful interventions, and help us to explain and organize knowledge. Such theories require a high degree of specificity, which in turn requires formal modeling. Yet, in psychological science, many theories are not precise and psychological scientists often lack the technical skills to formally specify existing theories. This problem raises the question: How can we promote formal theory development in psychology, where there are many content experts but few modelers? In this paper, we discuss one strategy for addressing this issue: a Many Modelers approach. Many Modelers consists of mixed teams of modelers and non-modelers that collaborate to create a formal theory of a phenomenon. Here, we report a proof of concept of this approach, which we piloted as a three-hour hackathon at the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science conference in 2021. After surveying the participants, results suggest that (a) psychologists who have never developed a formal model can become (more) excited about formal modeling + and theorizing; (b) a division of labor in formal theorizing is possible where only one or a few team members possess the prerequisite modeling expertise; and (c) first working prototypes of a theoretical model can be created in a short period of time. These results show some promise for the many modelers approach as a team science tool for theory development.
Noah van Dongen, Adam Finnemann, Jill de Ron, Leonid Tiokhin, Shirley Wang, Johannes Algermissen, Elena C. Altmann, Štěpán Bahník, Li-Ching Chuang, Andrei Dumbravă, Jens Fuenderich, Sandra J. Geiger, Daria Gerasimova, Aidai Golan, Judith Herbers, Marc Jekel, Anton Kunnari, Yih-Shiuan Lin, David Moreau, Yvonne Oberholzer, Hannah Katharina Peetz, Julia M. Rohrer, Adrian Rothers, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Yashvin Seetahul, Anna Szabelska, Natasha Tonge, Nicole Walasek, Marlene Werner, Denny Borsboom (2025). Practicing Theory Building in a Many Modelers Hackathon. Meta-Psychology, 9, DOI: 10.15626/mp.2023.3688.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
30
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Meta-Psychology
DOI
10.15626/mp.2023.3688
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access