RDL logo
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
​
​
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Optimal Duration of Follow-up for Assessing Antimalarial Efficacy in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort Followed Up Until Delivery on the Thailand–Myanmar Border

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
English
2019

Optimal Duration of Follow-up for Assessing Antimalarial Efficacy in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort Followed Up Until Delivery on the Thailand–Myanmar Border

0 Datasets

0 Files

English
2019
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Vol 6 (7)
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz264

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Sir Nicholas White
Sir Nicholas White

University Of Cambridge

Verified
Makoto Saito
Rashid Mansoor
Jacher Wiladphaingern
+7 more

Abstract

Background Follow-up for 28–42 days is recommended by the World Health Organization to assess antimalarial drug efficacy for nonpregnant populations. This study aimed to determine the optimal duration for pregnant women, as no specific guidance currently exists. Methods The distributions of time to recrudescence (treatment failure), confirmed by polymerase chain reaction genotyping for different antimalarial drugs in pregnancy, were analyzed by accelerated failure time models using secondary data on microscopically confirmed recurrent falciparum malaria collected in prospective studies on the Thailand–Myanmar border between 1994 and 2010. Results Of 946 paired isolates from 703 women, the median duration of follow-up for each genotyped recurrence (interquartile range) was 129 (83–174) days, with 429 polymerase chain reaction–confirmed recrudescent. Five different treatments were evaluated, and 382 Plasmodium falciparum recrudescences were identified as eligible. With log-logistic models adjusted for baseline parasitemia, the predicted cumulative proportions of all the recrudescences that were detected by 28 days were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65%–74%) for quinine monotherapy (n = 295), 66% (95% CI, 53%–76%) for artesunate monotherapy (n = 43), 62% (95% CI, 42%–79%) for artemether–lumefantrine (AL; n = 19), 46% (95% CI, 26%–67%) for artesunate with clindamycin (n = 19), and 34% (95% CI, 11%–67%) for dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (DP; n = 6). Corresponding figures by day 42 were 89% (95% CI, 77%–95%) for AL and 71% (95% CI, 38%–91%) for DP. Follow-up for 63 days was predicted to detect ≥95% of all recrudescence, except for DP. Conclusions In low-transmission settings, antimalarial drug efficacy assessments in pregnancy require longer follow-up than for nonpregnant populations.

How to cite this publication

Makoto Saito, Rashid Mansoor, Jacher Wiladphaingern, Moo Kho Paw, Mupawjay Pimanpanarak, Stéphane Proux, Philippe J. Guérin, Sir Nicholas White, François Nosten, Rose McGready (2019). Optimal Duration of Follow-up for Assessing Antimalarial Efficacy in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort Followed Up Until Delivery on the Thailand–Myanmar Border. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 6(7), DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz264.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2019

Authors

10

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

English

Journal

Open Forum Infectious Diseases

DOI

10.1093/ofid/ofz264

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration