0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessDifferences in HA subfields between people with OCD and healthy controls are dependent on medication status, in line with previous work on other brain volumetric alterations in OCD. This emphasizes the importance of considering psychotropic medication in neuroimaging studies of OCD.
Ziphozihle Ntwatwa, Christine Löchner, Annerine Roos, Tatum Sevenoaks, Jack van Honk, Marcelo C. Batistuzzo, Sunah Choi, Marcelo Q. Hoexter, Minah Kim, Jun Soo Kwon, David Mataix-Cols, José M. Menchón, Eurı́pedes Constantino Miguel, Takashi Nakamae, Carles Soriano‐Mas, Dick J. Veltman, Nynke A. Groenewold, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Dan Joseph Stein, Jonathan Ipser (2025). Hippocampal and amygdala subfield volumes in obsessive–compulsive disorder by medication status. , 50(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230119.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
20
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230119
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access
