0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessA universal taxonomy of viruses is essential for a comprehensive view of the virus world and for communicating the complicated evolutionary relationships among viruses. However, there are major differences in the conceptualisation and approaches to virus classification and nomenclature among virologists, clinicians, agronomists, and other interested parties. Here, we provide recommendations to guide the construction of a coherent and comprehensive virus taxonomy, based on expert scientific consensus. Firstly, assignments of viruses should be congruent with the best attainable reconstruction of their evolutionary histories, i.e., taxa should be monophyletic. This fundamental principle for classification of viruses is currently included in the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) code only for the rank of species. Secondly, phenotypic and ecological properties of viruses may inform, but not override, evolutionary relatedness in the placement of ranks. Thirdly, alternative classifications that consider phenotypic attributes, such as being vector-borne (e.g., “arboviruses”), infecting a certain type of host (e.g., “mycoviruses,” “bacteriophages”) or displaying specific pathogenicity (e.g., “human immunodeficiency viruses”), may serve important clinical and regulatory purposes but often create polyphyletic categories that do not reflect evolutionary relationships. Nevertheless, such classifications ought to be maintained if they serve the needs of specific communities or play a practical clinical or regulatory role. However, they should not be considered or called taxonomies. Finally, while an evolution-based framework enables viruses discovered by metagenomics to be incorporated into the ICTV taxonomy, there are essential requirements for quality control of the sequence data used for these assignments. Combined, these four principles will enable future development and expansion of virus taxonomy as the true evolutionary diversity of viruses becomes apparent.
Peter Simmonds, Evelien M. Adriaenssens, F. Murilo Zerbini, Nicola G. A. Abrescia, Pakorn Aiewsakun, Poliane Alfenas‐Zerbini, Yīmíng Bào, Jakub Barylski, Christian Drosten, Siobain Duffy, W. Paul Duprex, Bas E. Dutilh, Santiago F. Elena, María Laura García, Sandra Junglen, Aris Katzourakis, Eugene V Koonin, Mart Krupovìč, Jens H. Kuhn, Amy J. Lambert, Elliot J. Lefkowitz, Małgorzata Łobocka, Cédric Lood, Jennifer Mahony, Jan P. Meier‐Kolthoff, Arcady Mushegian, Hanna M. Oksanen, Minna M. Poranen, Alejandro Reyes, David L. Robertson, Simon Roux, Luisa Rubino, Sead Sabanadzovic, Stuart G. Siddell, Tim Skern, Donald B. Smith, Matthew B. Sullivan, Nobuhiro Suzuki, Dann Turner, Koenraad Van Doorslaer, Anne‐Mieke Vandamme, Arvind Varsani, Nikos Vasilakis (2023). Four principles to establish a universal virus taxonomy. , 21(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001922.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2023
Authors
43
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001922
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free AccessYes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration