0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessBalloon angioplasty achieves luminal enlargement by fracturing the atherosclerotic intima at its point of least resistance, thereby creating a dissection plane and space with dehiscence of the intima from the media. This barotraumatic dissection triggers an inflammatory and proliferative reaction, resulting in a restenosis process at medium-term. In the era of plain old balloon angioplasty, quantitative angiographic studies at follow-up demonstrated that - the greater the acute luminal gain was after balloon angioplasty, the greater the late luminal loss was at follow-up. The interventional cardiologists coined the following motto “the more you gain, the more you lose”. However, in the current era of drug coated balloon (DCB), it appears that this vexing conundrum could have been abrogated. A recently published DCB study in small de novo vessel has demonstrated that there was a slightly negative correlation between the volume of dissection assessed by optical coherence tomography and the angiographic late luminal loss (now gain) after Paclitaxel coated balloon treatment. In other words, the barotraumatic dissection does not necessarily herald a restenosis process in the era of DCB. This article revisits the mechanism of balloon angioplasty and explores how DCB with Paclitaxel may change the paradigm of balloon angioplasty as default treatment in CAD percutaneous treatment.
Patrick W. Serruys, Akihiro Tobe, Kai Ninomiya, Scot Garg, Aloke V. Finn, Bruno Scheller, Bernardo Cortese, Antonio Colombo, Bernhard Reimers, Sandeep Basavarajaiah, Faisal Sharif, Simone Fezzi, Chao Gao, Ling Tao, Yoshinobu Onuma (2024). Editorial: Is the axiom of balloon angioplasty, “the more you gain the more you lose”, still true in the era of DCB with paclitaxel?. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.001.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Editorial Material
Year
2024
Authors
15
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine
DOI
10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.001
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access