RDL logo
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
​
​
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
English
1996

Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power

0 Datasets

0 Files

English
1996
NeuroImage
Vol 4 (3)
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0074

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Karl Friston
Karl Friston

University College London

Verified
Karl Friston
Andrew P. Holmes
J.‐P. Poline
+2 more

Abstract

This paper is about detecting activations in statistical parametric maps and considers the relative sensitivity of a nested hierarchy of tests that we have framed in terms of the level of inference (voxel level, cluster level, and set level). These tests are based on the probability of obtainingc, or more, clusters withk, or more, voxels, above a thresholdu. This probability has a reasonably simple form and is derived using distributional approximations from the theory of Gaussian fields. The most important contribution of this work is the notion ofset-level inference.Set-level inference refers to the statistical inference that the number of clusters comprising an observed activation profile is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This inference pertains to the set of activations reaching criteria and represents a new way of assigningPvalues to distributed effects. Cluster-level inferences are a special case of set-level inferences, which obtain when the number of clustersc= 1. Similarly voxel-level inferences are special cases of cluster-level inferences that result when the cluster can be very small (i.e.,k =0). Using a theoretical power analysis of distributed activations, we observed that set-level inferences are generally more powerful than cluster-level inferences and that cluster-level inferences are generally more powerful than voxel-level inferences. The price paid for this increased sensitivity is reduced localizing power: Voxel-level tests permit individual voxels to be identified as significant, whereas cluster- and set-level inferences only allow clusters or sets of clusters to be so identified. For all levels of inference the spatial size of the underlying signalf(relative to resolution) determines the most powerful thresholds to adopt. For set-level inferences iffis large (e.g., fMRI) then the optimum extent threshold should be greater than the expected number of voxels for each cluster. Iffis small (e.g., PET) the extent threshold should be small. We envisage that set-level inferences will find a role in making statistical inferences about distributed activations, particularly in fMRI.

How to cite this publication

Karl Friston, Andrew P. Holmes, J.‐P. Poline, C.J. Price, Chris Frith (1996). Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power. NeuroImage, 4(3), pp. 223-235, DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0074.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

1996

Authors

5

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

English

Journal

NeuroImage

DOI

10.1006/nimg.1996.0074

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access