0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThis paper is about detecting activations in statistical parametric maps and considers the relative sensitivity of a nested hierarchy of tests that we have framed in terms of the level of inference (voxel level, cluster level, and set level). These tests are based on the probability of obtainingc, or more, clusters withk, or more, voxels, above a thresholdu. This probability has a reasonably simple form and is derived using distributional approximations from the theory of Gaussian fields. The most important contribution of this work is the notion ofset-level inference.Set-level inference refers to the statistical inference that the number of clusters comprising an observed activation profile is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This inference pertains to the set of activations reaching criteria and represents a new way of assigningPvalues to distributed effects. Cluster-level inferences are a special case of set-level inferences, which obtain when the number of clustersc= 1. Similarly voxel-level inferences are special cases of cluster-level inferences that result when the cluster can be very small (i.e.,k =0). Using a theoretical power analysis of distributed activations, we observed that set-level inferences are generally more powerful than cluster-level inferences and that cluster-level inferences are generally more powerful than voxel-level inferences. The price paid for this increased sensitivity is reduced localizing power: Voxel-level tests permit individual voxels to be identified as significant, whereas cluster- and set-level inferences only allow clusters or sets of clusters to be so identified. For all levels of inference the spatial size of the underlying signalf(relative to resolution) determines the most powerful thresholds to adopt. For set-level inferences iffis large (e.g., fMRI) then the optimum extent threshold should be greater than the expected number of voxels for each cluster. Iffis small (e.g., PET) the extent threshold should be small. We envisage that set-level inferences will find a role in making statistical inferences about distributed activations, particularly in fMRI.
Karl Friston, Andrew P. Holmes, J.‐P. Poline, C.J. Price, Chris Frith (1996). Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power. NeuroImage, 4(3), pp. 223-235, DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0074.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
1996
Authors
5
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
NeuroImage
DOI
10.1006/nimg.1996.0074
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access