0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessABSTRACT Globally, soils are subjected to various management practices and stressors which can lead to degradation. This makes their protection essential for sustaining many functions and services as well as maintaining the overall life support system of Earth. National monitoring programmes are increasingly implemented to evaluate the state and trend of soils, a move which has been advocated by the Mission Soil in Europe. In soil science, frameworks have been established to interpret and communicate soil monitoring results, concentrating on the concept of quality, a term which can be interpreted in many ways. This paper explores the multifaceted meaning of soil quality, addressing its implications for future soil health assessments. It achieves this by focusing on the context of the Mission Soil. Soil health is a holistic concept embracing emergence, complexity and highlighting long‐term vitality and resilience. In contrast, soil quality is often viewed through the lens of its capacity to meet specific human needs and functions, typically in a shorter timeframe. The concept of quality is assessed through indicators where the choice of framework significantly influences selection and interpretation. However, selecting appropriate soil indicators across Europe is challenging due to diverse climate, topography, geology and soil types, resulting in varied soil processes. Therefore, establishing clear principles and criteria for soil indicator selection is essential. Our paper identifies four distinct frameworks for soil quality assessment: ‘Fitness for Purpose’, ‘Free from Degradation’, ‘External Benchmarking’ and ‘Value Assessment’, with each possessing a unique role and application. Notably, the ‘Free from Degradation’ framework is emphasised for its alignment with soil protection efforts and its relevance to soil threats. This makes it particularly suitable for pan‐European assessments conducted by the European Union Soil Observatory (EUSO).
Grant L. Campbell, Pete Smith, Nils Broothaerts, Panos Panagos, Arwyn Jones, Cristiano Ballabio, Daniele De Rosa, Lis Wollesen de Jonge, Emmanuel Arthur, Lucas Carvalho Gomes, Nima Shokri, Mehdi H. Afshar, Gergely Tóth, Peter Lehmann, Pasquale Borrelli, Christine Alewell, Robert Minařík, Tomislav Hengl, Ichsani Wheeler, Lindsay C. Maskell, Madlene Nussbaum, L. R. Jones, Christopher J. Feeney, David A. Robinson (2025). Continental Scale Soil Monitoring: A Proposed Multi‐Scale Framing of Soil Quality. , 76(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70174.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
24
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70174
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access