0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessApoptotic cells have long been considered as intrinsically tolerogenic or unable to elicit immune responses specific for dead cell-associated antigens. However, multiple stimuli can trigger a functionally peculiar type of apoptotic demise that does not go unnoticed by the adaptive arm of the immune system, which we named "immunogenic cell death" (ICD). ICD is preceded or accompanied by the emission of a series of immunostimulatory damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in a precise spatiotemporal configuration. Several anticancer agents that have been successfully employed in the clinic for decades, including various chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy, can elicit ICD. Moreover, defects in the components that underlie the capacity of the immune system to perceive cell death as immunogenic negatively influence disease outcome among cancer patients treated with ICD inducers. Thus, ICD has profound clinical and therapeutic implications. Unfortunately, the gold-standard approach to detect ICD relies on vaccination experiments involving immunocompetent murine models and syngeneic cancer cells, an approach that is incompatible with large screening campaigns. Here, we outline strategies conceived to detect surrogate markers of ICD in vitro and to screen large chemical libraries for putative ICD inducers, based on a high-content, high-throughput platform that we recently developed. Such a platform allows for the detection of multiple DAMPs, like cell surface-exposed calreticulin, extracellular ATP and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and/or the processes that underlie their emission, such as endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy and necrotic plasma membrane permeabilization. We surmise that this technology will facilitate the development of next-generation anticancer regimens, which kill malignant cells and simultaneously convert them into a cancer-specific therapeutic vaccine.
Oliver Kepp, Laura Senovilla, Ilio Vitale, Erika Vacchelli, Sandy Adjemian, Patrizia Agostinis, Lionel Apétoh, Fernando Aranda, Vincenzo Barnaba, Norma Bloy, Laura Bracci, Karine Breckpot, David Brough, Aitziber Buqué, María G. Castro, Mara Cirone, María I. Colombo, Isabelle Cremer, Sandra Demaria, Luciana Dini, Aristides G. Eliopoulos, Alberto Faggioni, Silvia C. Formenti, Jitka Fučíková, Lucia Gabriele, Udo S. Gaipl, Jérôme Galon, Abhishek D. Garg, François Ghiringhelli, Nathalia A. Giese, Zong Sheng Guo, Akseli Hemminki, Martin Herrmann, James W. Hodge, Stefan Holdenrieder, Jamie Honeychurch, Hong‐Ming Hu, Xing Huang, Tim Illidge, Koji Kono, Mladen Korbelik, Dmitri V. Krysko, Sherene Loi, Pedro R. Löwenstein, Enrico Lugli, Yuting Ma, Frank Madeo, Angelo A. Manfredi, Isabelle Martins, Domenico Mavilio, Laurie Menger, Nicolò Merendino, Michael Michaud, Grégoire Mignot, Karen Mossman, Gabriele Multhoff, Rudolf Oehler, Fabio Palombo, Theocharis Panaretakis, Jonathan Pol, Enrico Proietti, Jean‐Ehrland Ricci, Chiara Riganti, Patrizia Rovere‐Querini, Anna Rubartelli, Antonella Sistigu, Mark J. Smyth, Juergen Sonnemann, Radek Špíšek, John Stagg, Abdul Qader Sukkurwala, Éric Tartour, Andrew Thorburn, Stephen H. Thorne, Peter Vandenabeele, Francesca Velotti, Samuel T. Workenhe, Haining Yang, Wei‐Xing Zong, Laurence Zitvogel, Guido Guido Kroemer, Lorenzo Galluzzi (2014). Consensus guidelines for the detection of immunogenic cell death. , 3(9), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/21624011.2014.955691.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2014
Authors
82
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4161/21624011.2014.955691
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access