0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessBackground Our aims were to compare coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and stenting for the treatment of diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease enrolled in the Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) trial and to determine the costs of these 2 treatment strategies. Methods and Results Patients (n=1205) were randomly assigned to stent implantation (n=600; diabetic, 112) or CABG (n=605; diabetic, 96). Costs per patient were calculated as the product of each patient’s use of resources and the corresponding unit costs. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. At 1 year, diabetic patients treated with stenting had the lowest event-free survival rate (63.4%) because of a higher incidence of repeat revascularization compared with both diabetic patients treated with CABG (84.4%, P <0.001) and nondiabetic patients treated with stents (76.2%, P =0.04). Conversely, diabetic and nondiabetic patients experienced similar 1-year event-free survival rates when treated with CABG (84.4% and 88.4%). The total 1-year costs for stenting and CABG in diabetic patients were $12 855 and $16 585 ( P <0.001) and in the nondiabetic groups, $10 164 for stenting and $13 082 for surgery. Conclusions Multivessel diabetic patients treated with stenting had a worse 1-year outcome than patients assigned to CABG or nondiabetics treated with stenting. The strategy of stenting was less costly than CABG, however, regardless of diabetic status.
Alexandre Abizaid, Marco A. Costa, Marinella Centemero, Alexandre Abizaid, Victor Legrand, Robert V. Limet, Gerhard Schüler, Friedrich W. Mohr, Wietze Lindeboom, Amanda G. M. R. Sousa, J. Eduardo Sousa, Ben van Hout, Paul G. Hugenholtz, Felix Unger, Patrick W. Serruys (2001). Clinical and Economic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Percutaneous and Surgical Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Disease Patients. Circulation, 104(5), pp. 533-538, DOI: 10.1161/hc3101.093700.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2001
Authors
15
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Circulation
DOI
10.1161/hc3101.093700
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access