Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Attitudes and Perceptions of Biomedical Journal Editors-in-Chief Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scholarly Publishing Process: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Preprint
en
2025

Attitudes and Perceptions of Biomedical Journal Editors-in-Chief Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scholarly Publishing Process: A Cross-Sectional Survey

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2025
DOI: 10.1101/2025.05.26.25328101

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
David Moher
David Moher

Institution not specified

Verified
Jeremy Y. Ng
M. Krishnamurthy
Gursimran Deol
+14 more

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Artificial intelligence chatbots (AICs) are designed to mimic human conversations through text or speech, offering both opportunities and challenges in scholarly publishing. While journal policies of AICs are becoming more defined, there is still a limited understanding of how Editors-in-Chief (EiCs) of biomedical journals’ view these tools. This survey examined EiCs’ attitudes and perceptions, highlighting positive aspects, such as language and grammar support, and concerns regarding setup time, training requirements, and ethical considerations towards the use of AICs in the scholarly publishing process. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted, targeting EiCs of biomedical journals across multiple publishers. Of 3725 journals screened, 3381 eligible emails were identified through web scraping and manual verification. Survey invitations were sent to all identified EiCs. The survey remained open for 5 weeks, with three follow-up email reminders. Results The survey had a response rate of 16.5% (510 total responses) and a completion rate of 87.0%. Most respondents were familiar with AI chatbots (66.7%), however, most had not utilized chatbots in their editorial work (83.7%) and many expressed interest in further training (64.4%). EiCs acknowledged benefits such as language and grammar support (70.8%) but expressed mixed attitudes on AIC roles in accelerating peer review. Perceptions included the initial time and resources required for setup (83.7%), training needs (83.9%), and ethical considerations (80.6%). Conclusions This study found that EiCs have mixed attitudes toward AICs, with some EICs acknowledging their potential to enhance editorial efficiency, particularly in tasks like language editing, while others expressed concerns about the ethical implications, the time and resources required for implementation, and the need for additional training.

How to cite this publication

Jeremy Y. Ng, M. Krishnamurthy, Gursimran Deol, Wid Al-Zahraa Al-Khafaji, V. Balaji, Makonnen Abebe, Jyot Adhvaryu, Tejas Karrthik, Pranavee Mohanakanthan, Adharva Vellaparambil, L.M. Bouter, R. Brian Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Cynthia Lokker, Hervé Maisonneuve, Ana Marušić, David Moher (2025). Attitudes and Perceptions of Biomedical Journal Editors-in-Chief Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scholarly Publishing Process: A Cross-Sectional Survey. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.26.25328101.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Preprint

Year

2025

Authors

17

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.26.25328101

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access