0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessBackground Severe malaria is a major cause of childhood death and often the main reason for paediatric hospital admission in sub-Saharan Africa. Quinine is still the established treatment of choice, although evidence from Asia suggests that artesunate is associated with a lower mortality. We compared parenteral treatment with either artesunate or quinine in African children with severe malaria. Methods This open-label, randomised trial was undertaken in 11 centres in nine African countries. Children (<15 years) with severe falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to parenteral artesunate or parenteral quinine. Randomisation was in blocks of 20, with study numbers corresponding to treatment allocations kept inside opaque sealed paper envelopes. The trial was open label at each site, and none of the investigators or trialists, apart from for the trial statistician, had access to the summaries of treatment allocations. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN50258054. Findings 5425 children were enrolled; 2712 were assigned to artesunate and 2713 to quinine. All patients were analysed for the primary outcome. 230 (8·5%) patients assigned to artesunate treatment died compared with 297 (10·9%) assigned to quinine treatment (odds ratio [OR] stratified for study site 0·75, 95% CI 0·63–0·90; relative reduction 22·5%, 95% CI 8·1–36·9; p=0·0022). Incidence of neurological sequelae did not differ significantly between groups, but the development of coma (65/1832 [3·5%] with artesunate vs 91/1768 [5·1%] with quinine; OR 0·69 95% CI 0·49–0·95; p=0·0231), convulsions (224/2712 [8·3%] vs 273/2713 [10·1%]; OR 0·80, 0·66–0·97; p=0·0199), and deterioration of the coma score (166/2712 [6·1%] vs 208/2713 [7·7%]; OR 0·78, 0·64–0·97; p=0·0245) were all significantly less frequent in artesunate recipients than in quinine recipients. Post-treatment hypoglycaemia was also less frequent in patients assigned to artesunate than in those assigned to quinine (48/2712 [1·8%] vs 75/2713 [2·8%]; OR 0·63, 0·43–0·91; p=0·0134). Artesunate was well tolerated, with no serious drug-related adverse effects. Interpretation Artesunate substantially reduces mortality in African children with severe malaria. These data, together with a meta-analysis of all trials comparing artesunate and quinine, strongly suggest that parenteral artesunate should replace quinine as the treatment of choice for severe falciparum malaria worldwide. Funding The Wellcome Trust.
Arjen M. Dondorp, Caterina Fanello, Ilse C. E. Hendriksen, Ermelinda Gomes, Amir Seni, Kajal Chhaganlal, Kalifa Bojang, Rasaq Olaosebikan, Nkechinyere Anunobi, Kathryn Maitland, Esther Kivaya, Tsiri Agbenyega, Samuel Blay Nguah, Jennifer Evans, Samwel Gesase, Catherine Kahabuka, George Mtove, Behzad Nadjm, Jacqueline Deen, Juliet Mwanga‐Amumpaire, Margaret Nansumba, Corine Karema, Noella Umulisa, Aline Uwimana, Olugbenga Ayodeji Mokuolu, Olanrewaju T. Adedoyin, Wahab BR Johnson, Antoinette Tshefu, Marie Onyamboko, Tharisara Sakulthaew, Wirichada Pan‐ngum, Kamolrat Silamut, Kasia Stepniewska, Charles J. Woodrow, Delia Bethell, Bridget Wills, Martina Oneko, Tim Peto, Lorenz von Seidlein, Nicholas Day, Sir Nicholas White (2010). Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): an open-label, randomised trial. The Lancet, 376(9753), pp. 1647-1657, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61924-1.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2010
Authors
41
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
The Lancet
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61924-1
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access