RDL logo
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
​
​
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed?

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
English
2000

Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed?

0 Datasets

0 Files

English
2000
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Vol 32 (2)
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
James Sallis
James Sallis

University Of California, San Diego

Verified
Stewart G. Trost
Russell R. Pate
Patty S. Freedson
+2 more

Abstract

TROST, S. G., R. R. PATE, P. S. FREEDSON, J. F. SALLIS, and W. C. TAYLOR. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 426–431, 2000. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish the minimal number of days of monitoring required for accelerometers to assess usual physical activity in children. Methods: A total of 381 students (189 M, 192 F) wore a CSA 7164 uniaxial accelerometer for seven consecutive days. To examine age-related trends students were grouped as follows: Group I: grades 1–3 (N = 92); Group II: grades 4–6 (N = 98); Group III: grades 7–9 (N = 97); Group IV: grades 10–12 (N = 94). Average daily time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was calculated from minute-by-minute activity counts using the regression equation developed by Freedson et al. (1997). Results: Compared with adolescents in grades 7 to 12, children in grades 1 to 6 exhibited less day-to-day variability in MVPA behavior. Spearman-Brown analyses indicated that between 4 and 5 d of monitoring would be necessary to a achieve a reliability of 0.80 in children, and between 8 and 9 d of monitoring would be necessary to achieve a reliability of 0.80 in adolescents. Within all grade levels, the 7-d monitoring protocol produced acceptable estimates of daily participation in MVPA (R = 0.76 (0.71–0.81) to 0.87 (0.84–0.90)). Compared with weekdays, children exhibited significantly higher levels of MVPA on weekends, whereas adolescents exhibited significantly lower levels of MVPA on weekends. Principal components analysis revealed two distinct time components for MVPA during the day for children (early morning, rest of the day), and three distinct time components for MVPA during the day for adolescents (morning, afternoon, early evening). Conclusions: These results indicate that a 7-d monitoring protocol provides reliable estimates of usual physical activity behavior in children and adolescents and accounts for potentially important differences in weekend versus weekday activity behavior as well as differences in activity patterns within a given day.

How to cite this publication

Stewart G. Trost, Russell R. Pate, Patty S. Freedson, James Sallis, Wendell C. Taylor (2000). Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed?. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 32(2), pp. 426-426, DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2000

Authors

5

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

English

Journal

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

DOI

10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access