0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAimsTo compare the tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) at 13 months, using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in an 'all-comers' population of patients, in order to clarify the mechanism of eventual differences in the biocompatibility and thrombogenicity of the devices.
Juan Luis Gutiérrez‐Chico, Robert J. Van Geuns, E. Regar, Willem J. van der Giessen, Henning Kelbæk, Kari Saunamäki, Javier Escaned, Nieves Gonzalo, Carlo Di Mario, Francesco Borgia, Eveline Nüesch, Héctor M. García‐García, Sigmund Silber, Stephan Windecker, Patrick W. Serruys (2011). Tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent at 13-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography substudy from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial. European Heart Journal, 32(19), pp. 2454-2463, DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr182.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2011
Authors
15
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
European Heart Journal
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehr182
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access
