0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessWe review four hypotheses for the control of carbon acquisition by roots, and conclude that the functional equilibrium hypothesis can offer a good description of C acquisition by roots relative to shoots, but is deficient mechanistically. The hypothesis that import into roots is solely dependent on export from the shoot, itself determined by features of the shoot alone (the ‘push’ hypothesis), is supported by some but not all the evidence. Similarly, the idea that root demand, a function of the root alone, determines import into it (the ‘pull’ hypothesis), is consonant with some of the evidence. The fourth, general, hypothesis (the ‘shared control’ hypothesis) – that acquisition of C by roots is controlled by a range of variables distributed between root and shoot – accords with both experiment and theory. Top‐down metabolic control analysis quantifies the control of C flux attributable to root relative to source leaf. We demonstrate that two levels of mechanistic control, short‐term regulation of phloem transport and control of gene expression by compounds such as sugars, underlie distributed control. Implications for the impact of climate change variables are briefly discussed.
J. F. FARRAR, Davey L Jones (2000). The control of carbon acquisition by roots. New Phytologist, 147(1), pp. 43-53, DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00688.x.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2000
Authors
2
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
New Phytologist
DOI
10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00688.x
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access