0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessIn this paper we will describe the arguments to adopt a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct, we argue that this will increase the principle of legal certainty, improve procedures, and will promote scientific integrity in other, indirect ways. With the platform that we are currently setting up in the Netherlands as a motivating example, we finally also describe the prerequisites for such a platform, its contents as well as its value in the international context.
Bob Siegerink, Lodewijk A. Pet, Frits R. Rosendaal, M.Y.H.G. Erkens (2023). The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct. Accountability in Research, pp. 1-12, DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2172678.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2023
Authors
4
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Accountability in Research
DOI
10.1080/08989621.2023.2172678
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access
.jpg){kind=avatar}
