0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessCarotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) is greater in adults with elevated metabolic risk profiles. However, the influence of body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC) on the relationship between IMT and metabolic risk is unclear.Adults from the Bogalusa Heart Study were classified as normal weight, overweight, or obese and into WC categories (men, low <94 cm, moderate 94-101.9 cm, high ≥102 cm; women, low <80 cm, moderate 80-87.9 cm, high ≥88 cm). Elevated metabolic risk was defined by cardiovascular risk factor clustering (≥2 abnormal risk factors or insulin resistance (upper quartile of homeostasis model of insulin resistance). Carotid ultrasound measurements were obtained and mean IMT was calculated. General linear models compared IMT between elevated versus normal metabolic risk groups, adjusting for sex, age, race/ethnicity, and either BMI or WC category.Adults were 24-43 years of age (n = 991) and 41% had elevated metabolic risk (42% male, 28% African American, 38% obese). IMT (mm) was greater in adults with elevated metabolic risk (0.83 ± 0.007) versus normal risk (0.80 ± 0.006) whether adjusted by BMI or WC (both P < 0.0005). IMT was greater in adults with elevated compared to normal metabolic risk within normal-weight (0.84 ± 0.016 vs. 0.79 ± 0.008; P = 0.002), and obese adults (0.86 ± 0.009 vs. 0.80 ± 0.01; P = 0.03), but not significantly different between risk groups in overweight adults. Similar results were found when stratified by WC category.Adults with elevated metabolic risk have greater IMT than those with normal risk in normal-weight, overweight, low WC, and high WC, but not significant for overweight or moderate WC categories.
Sarah M. Camhi, Peter T. Katzmarzyk, Stephanie T. Broyles, Sathanur R. Srinivasan, Wei Chen, Claude Bouchard, Gerald S. Berenson (2010). Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Metabolic Risk: Role of Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, 9(2), pp. 119-125, DOI: 10.1089/met.2010.0079.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2010
Authors
7
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders
DOI
10.1089/met.2010.0079
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access