0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessPurpose Develop strategic priorities to guide future physical activity surveillance in the United States. Methods The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine convened a scientific roundtable of physical activity and measurement experts. Participants summarized the current state of aerobic physical activity surveillance for adults, focusing on practice and research needs in three areas: 1) behavior, 2) human movement, and 3) community supports. Needs and challenges for each area were identified. At the conclusion of the meeting, experts identified one overarching strategy and five strategic priorities to guide future surveillance. Results The identified overarching strategy was to develop a national plan for physical activity surveillance similar to the U.S. National Physical Activity Plan for promotion. The purpose of the plan would be to enhance coordination and collaboration within and between sectors, such as transportation and public health, and to address specific strategic priorities identified at the roundtable. These strategic priorities were used 1) to identify and prioritize physical activity constructs; 2) to assess the psychometric properties of instruments for physical activity surveillance; 3) to provide training and technical assistance for those collecting, analyzing, or interpreting surveillance data; 4) to explore accessing data from alternative sources; and 5) to improve communication, translation, and dissemination about estimates of physical activity from surveillance systems. Conclusion This roundtable provided strategic priorities for physical activity surveillance in the United States. A first step is to develop a national plan for physical activity surveillance that would provide an operating framework from which to execute these priorities.
Janet E. Fulton, Susan A. Carlson, Barbara E. Ainsworth, David Berrigan, Cynthia Carlson, Joan M. Dorn, Gregory W. Heath, Harold W. Kohl, I‐Min Lee, Sarah M. Lee, Louise C. Mâsse, James R. Morrow, Kelley Pettee Gabriel, James M. Pivarnik, Nicolaas P. Pronk, Anne B. Rodgers, Brian E. Saelens, James Sallis, Richard P. Troiano, Catrine Tudor‐Locke, Arthur M. Wendel (2016). Strategic Priorities for Physical Activity Surveillance in the United States. Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 1(13), pp. 111-123, DOI: 10.1249/tjx.0000000000000020.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2016
Authors
21
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine
DOI
10.1249/tjx.0000000000000020
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access