0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThe flux of CO2 from the soil to the atmosphere–soil respiration (R S), is one of the least known components of the terrestrial carbon cycle. R S depends on many factors and varies substantially in time and space. High uncertainty of R S flux valuation leads to a wide range of reported carbon budget estimates for Russian forests. We developed a modeling system for assessing soil carbon stock and heterotrophic soil respiration based on a possible maximum of relevant input indicators. The most comprehensive databases of RS in situ measurements focused on Northern Eurasia (780 records for the region) has been used. A statistical model for assessing R S of Russian forests and its separation in autotrophic and heterotrophic parts were elaborated based on in situ measurements, climate parameters, soil and land cover datasets. The spatial resolution of the model is 1km2. Russian forest soil accumulated 144.5PgC (or 17.6kgCm−2) in 1m depth, including 8.3PgC (or 1.0kgCm−2) in the labile topsoil organic layer. The total heterotrophic soil respiration (RH) flux for the Russian forest is estimated at 1.7PgCyr−1 (206gCm−2 yr−1) that comprises 65% of Net Primary Production (NPP) and together with NPP is one of two major components of the net ecosystem carbon balance comprising on average 546TgCyr−1 (66gCm−2 yr−1) for 2007–2009. Interannual variability or R H in 1996–2005 was estimated at 4.1% for forests of the whole country and typically from 5 to 11% for large individual regions with an average linear trend +0.2% per year. The uncertainty of annual average of R H was estimated at 8% (confidential interval 0.9).
Liudmila Mukhortova, Dmitry Schepaschenko, А. Shvidenko, Ian McCallum, Florian Kraxner (2014). Soil contribution to carbon budget of Russian forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 200, pp. 97-108, DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.017.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2014
Authors
5
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
DOI
10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.017
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access