0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessStormwater is a vital resource and dynamic driver of terrestrial ecosystem processes. However, processes controlling interactions during and shortly after storms are often poorly seen and poorly sensed when direct observations are substituted with technological ones. We discuss how human observations complement technological ones and the benefits of scientists spending more time in the storm. Human observation can reveal ephemeral storm-related phenomena such as biogeochemical hot moments, organismal responses, and sedimentary processes that can then be explored in greater resolution using sensors and virtual experiments. Storm-related phenomena trigger lasting, oversized impacts on hydrologic and biogeochemical processes, organismal traits or functions, and ecosystem services at all scales. We provide examples of phenomena in forests, across disciplines and scales, that have been overlooked in past research to inspire mindful, holistic observation of ecosystems during storms. We conclude that technological observations alone are insufficient to trace the process complexity and unpredictability of fleeting biogeochemical or ecological events without the shower thoughts produced by scientists’ human sensory and cognitive systems during storms.
John T. Van Stan, Scott T. Allen, Doug P. Aubrey, Z. Carter Berry, Matthew Biddick, Miriam Coenders‐Gerrits, Paolo Giordani, Sybil G. Gotsch, E. D. Gutmann, Yakov Kuzyakov, Donát Magyar, Valentina S. A. Mella, Kevin E. Mueller, Alexandra G. Ponette‐González, Philipp Porada, Carla E. Rosenfeld, Jack Simmons, Kandikere R. Sridhar, Aron Stubbins, Travis Swanson (2023). Shower thoughts: why scientists should spend more time in the rain. BioScience, 73(6), pp. 441-452, DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biad044.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2023
Authors
20
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
BioScience
DOI
10.1093/biosci/biad044
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access