0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessObjectives This study sought to evaluate sex differences in procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)– and fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided revascularization strategies. Background An iFR-guided strategy has shown a lower revascularization rate than an FFR-guided strategy, without differences in clinical outcomes. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate stenosis to guide Revascularization) study, in which 601 women and 1,891 men were randomized to iFR- or FFR-guided strategy. The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. Results Among the entire population, women had a lower number of functionally significant lesions per patient (0.31 ± 0.51 vs. 0.43 ± 0.59; p < 0.001) and less frequently underwent revascularization than men (42.1% vs. 53.1%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean iFR value according to sex (0.91 ± 0.09 vs. 0.91 ± 0.10; p = 0.442). However, the mean FFR value was lower in men than in women (0.83 ± 0.09 vs. 0.85 ± 0.10; p = 0.001). In men, an FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than an iFR-guided strategy (57.1% vs. 49.3%; p = 0.001), but this difference was not observed in women (41.4% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.757). There was no difference in MACE rates between iFR- and FFR-guided strategies in both women (5.4% vs. 5.6%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 2.43; p = 0.805) and men (6.6% vs. 7.0%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.46; p = 0.919). Conclusions An FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than iFR-guided strategy in men, but not in women. However, iFR- and FFR-guided strategies showed comparable clinical outcomes, regardless of sex. (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to guide Revascularization [DEFINE-FLAIR]; NCT02053038)
Chee Hae Kim, Bon‐Kwon Koo, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi, Joo Myung Lee, Joon‐Hyung Doh, Chang‐Wook Nam, Eun‐Seok Shin, Christopher Cook, Rasha Al‐Lamee, Ricardo Petraco, Sayan Sen, Iqbal Malik, Sukhjinder Nijjer, Hernán Mejía‐Rentería, Eduardo Alegría‐Barrero, Ali Alghamdi, John D. Altman, Sérgio Bravo Baptista, Ravinay Bhindi, Waldemar Bojara, Salvatore Brugaletta, Pedro Canas Silva, Carlo Di Mario, Andrejs Ērglis, Robert Gerber, Olaf Göing, Tobias Härle, Farrel Hellig, Ciro Indolfi, Luc Janssens, Allen Jeremias, Rajesh Kharbanda, Ahmed Khashaba, Yuetsu Kikuta, Florian Krackhardt, Mika Laine, Sam J. Lehman, Hitoshi Matsuo, Martijin Meuwissen, Giampaolo Niccoli, Jan J. Piek, Flavo Ribichini, Habib Samady, James Sapontis, Arnold H. Seto, Murat Sezer, Andrew S.P. Sharp, Jasvindar Singh, Hiroaki Takashima, Suneel Talwar, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Kare Tang, Éric Van Belle, Niels van Royen, Hugo Vinhas, Christiaan Vrints, D. Walters, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Bruce Samuels, Christopher E. Buller, Manesh R. Patel, Patrick W. Serruys, Javier Escaned, Justin E. Davies (2019). Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Revascularization Strategy. КАРДИОЛОГИЯ УЗБЕКИСТАНА, 12(20), pp. 2035-2046, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.035.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2019
Authors
64
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
КАРДИОЛОГИЯ УЗБЕКИСТАНА
DOI
10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.035
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access