RDL logo
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
​
​
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Revascularization Strategy

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
English
2019

Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Revascularization Strategy

0 Datasets

0 Files

English
2019
КАРДИОЛОГИЯ УЗБЕКИСТАНА
Vol 12 (20)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.035

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys

Imperial College London

Verified
Chee Hae Kim
Bon‐Kwon Koo
Hakim-Moulay Dehbi
+61 more

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to evaluate sex differences in procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)– and fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided revascularization strategies. Background An iFR-guided strategy has shown a lower revascularization rate than an FFR-guided strategy, without differences in clinical outcomes. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate stenosis to guide Revascularization) study, in which 601 women and 1,891 men were randomized to iFR- or FFR-guided strategy. The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. Results Among the entire population, women had a lower number of functionally significant lesions per patient (0.31 ± 0.51 vs. 0.43 ± 0.59; p < 0.001) and less frequently underwent revascularization than men (42.1% vs. 53.1%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean iFR value according to sex (0.91 ± 0.09 vs. 0.91 ± 0.10; p = 0.442). However, the mean FFR value was lower in men than in women (0.83 ± 0.09 vs. 0.85 ± 0.10; p = 0.001). In men, an FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than an iFR-guided strategy (57.1% vs. 49.3%; p = 0.001), but this difference was not observed in women (41.4% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.757). There was no difference in MACE rates between iFR- and FFR-guided strategies in both women (5.4% vs. 5.6%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 2.43; p = 0.805) and men (6.6% vs. 7.0%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.46; p = 0.919). Conclusions An FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than iFR-guided strategy in men, but not in women. However, iFR- and FFR-guided strategies showed comparable clinical outcomes, regardless of sex. (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to guide Revascularization [DEFINE-FLAIR]; NCT02053038)

How to cite this publication

Chee Hae Kim, Bon‐Kwon Koo, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi, Joo Myung Lee, Joon‐Hyung Doh, Chang‐Wook Nam, Eun‐Seok Shin, Christopher Cook, Rasha Al‐Lamee, Ricardo Petraco, Sayan Sen, Iqbal Malik, Sukhjinder Nijjer, Hernán Mejía‐Rentería, Eduardo Alegría‐Barrero, Ali Alghamdi, John D. Altman, Sérgio Bravo Baptista, Ravinay Bhindi, Waldemar Bojara, Salvatore Brugaletta, Pedro Canas Silva, Carlo Di Mario, Andrejs Ērglis, Robert Gerber, Olaf Göing, Tobias Härle, Farrel Hellig, Ciro Indolfi, Luc Janssens, Allen Jeremias, Rajesh Kharbanda, Ahmed Khashaba, Yuetsu Kikuta, Florian Krackhardt, Mika Laine, Sam J. Lehman, Hitoshi Matsuo, Martijin Meuwissen, Giampaolo Niccoli, Jan J. Piek, Flavo Ribichini, Habib Samady, James Sapontis, Arnold H. Seto, Murat Sezer, Andrew S.P. Sharp, Jasvindar Singh, Hiroaki Takashima, Suneel Talwar, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Kare Tang, Éric Van Belle, Niels van Royen, Hugo Vinhas, Christiaan Vrints, D. Walters, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Bruce Samuels, Christopher E. Buller, Manesh R. Patel, Patrick W. Serruys, Javier Escaned, Justin E. Davies (2019). Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Revascularization Strategy. КАРДИОЛОГИЯ УЗБЕКИСТАНА, 12(20), pp. 2035-2046, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.035.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2019

Authors

64

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

English

Journal

КАРДИОЛОГИЯ УЗБЕКИСТАНА

DOI

10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.035

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access