0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessBiological nitrification inhibition is a plant‐mediated rhizosphere process where natural nitrification inhibitors can be produced and released by roots to suppress nitrifier activity in soil. Nitrification is one of the critical soil processes in the nitrogen (N) cycle, but unrestricted and rapid nitrification in agricultural systems can result in major losses of N from the plant–soil system (i.e., by NO 3 − leaching and gaseous N emissions). In this study, we explored the potential efficacy of biological nitrification inhibitors (linoleic acid [LA] and linolenic acid [LN]) and a proven efficient synthetic (dicyandiamide [DCD]) nitrification inhibitor on N dynamics, nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions in a highly nitrifying soil. 14 C‐labelled LA, LN and DCD mineralization was determined in a parallel experiment to explore the fate of inhibitors after application. We found that LA and LN had no effect on soil NH 4 + concentrations, but significantly decreased NO 3 − concentrations. Soil that received DCD had lower NO 3 − and higher NH 4 + concentrations than the control (soil without nitrification inhibitors). LA and LN increased the cumulative N 2 O and CO 2 emissions when they were applied at high concentrations (635 or 1,270 mg kg −1 dry soil). LA and LN had a much greater mineralization rate than that of DCD: 47–56%, 37–61% and 2.7–5.5%, respectively, after 38 days incubation. We conclude that in contrast to the direct inhibition of nitrification caused by DCD, addition of LA and LN may cause apparent nitrification inhibition by promoting microbial immobilization of soil NH 4 + and/or NO 3 − . Future studies on nitrification inhibitors need to clearly differentiate between the direct and indirect effects that result from addition of these compounds to soil. Highlights The efficacy and stability of nitrification inhibitors in a highly nitrifying soil were explored. This study supports efforts to mitigate N losses and improve nitrogen use efficiency of inputs. Addition of LA, LN and DCD can decrease NO 3 − concentration, but their modes of action may be different. The apparent effect of LA and LN on soil NO 3 − concentration could be indirect.
Yan Ma, Davey L Jones, Jinyang Wang, L. M. Cardenas, David R. Chadwick (2021). Relative efficacy and stability of biological and synthetic nitrification inhibitors in a highly nitrifying soil: Evidence of apparent nitrification inhibition by linoleic acid and linolenic acid. European Journal of Soil Science, 72(6), pp. 2356-2371, DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13096.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2021
Authors
5
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
European Journal of Soil Science
DOI
10.1111/ejss.13096
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access