0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessLBA9584 Background: Neoadjuvant (neoadj) ipilimumab (IPI) + nivolumab (NIVO) showed improved event-free survival compared to adjuvant (adj) NIVO, but at the cost of increased immune related toxicity (irAEs). In the PRADO trial, impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was predominantly driven by the extent of the surgery and not by irAEs. To evaluate the effect of neoadj IPI+NIVO on HRQoL, we report the 36w HRQoL outcomes from the phase 3 NADINA trial. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomly assigned to receive 2 cycles of neoadj IPI+NIVO followed by a therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND; w6) and only in partial- or non-responders, 1y of adj systemic treatment; or TLND (w0) followed by 12 cycles adj NIVO. EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires (qtn) were digitally collected at baseline, w6, w12 and thereafter q12w. The unadjusted HRQoL scores (scale 0-100) were assessed for pts who completed 39w of follow-up (FU) on January 12, 2024. Results: 261/423 randomized pts had 39w FU at data cutoff. 81% completed the qtn at BL, with thereafter an average compliance of 80%. QLQ-C30 data were available for 107 pts in the neoadj arm and 103 in the adj arm. Physical-, role-, emotional functioning, and pain were comparable between the neoadj and adj arm across all timepoints (Table), as were fatigue and the summary score. A numerical trend towards worsening of physical-, role functioning, and pain was seen at w6 for the adj arm and at w12 for the neoadj arm, representing the post-surgery QoL timepoints. Conclusion: Using fully digitalized data collection, this first HRQoL analysis of neoadj vs adj immunotherapy in stage III melanoma showed comparable results between the neoadj and adj arms. Physical-, role functioning, and pain were impaired in both groups at the first post-surgery timepoint. Clinical trial information: NCT04949113 . [Table: see text]
Minke W. Lucas, Reetta Arokoski, Alexander M. Menzies, Saskia Pulleman, Robyn P.M. Saw, Winan J. van Houdt, Mark B. Faries, Caroline Robert, Paolo A. Ascierto, Célèste Lebbé, Matteo S. Carlino, Ellen Kapiteijn, Karijn P.M. Suijkerbuijk, Piotr Rutkowski, Shahneen Sandhu, Astrid Aplonia Maria Van Der Veldt, Georgina V. Long, Christian U. Blank, Lonneke V. van de Poll‐Franse, Judith Lijnsvelt (2024). Quality of life with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) versus adjuvant nivolumab in resectable stage III melanoma: 36-week data from the phase 3 NADINA trial.. , 42(17_suppl), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba9584.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2024
Authors
20
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba9584
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access