0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThe Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that global warming is "unequivocal" and that most of the observed increase since the mid-twentieth century is very likely due to the increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations, with discernible human influences on ocean warming, continental-average temperatures, temperature extremes, wind patterns, and other physical and biological indicators, impacting both socioeconomic and ecological systems. It is now clear that we are committed to some level of global climate change, and it is imperative that this be considered when planning future climate research and observational strategies. The Global Climate Observing System program (GCOS), the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP), and the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) therefore initiated a process to summarize the lessons learned through AR4 Working Groups I and II and to identify a set of high-priority modeling and observational needs. Two classes of recommendations emerged. First is the need to improve climate models, observational and climate monitoring systems, and our understanding of key processes. Second, the framework for climate research and observations must be extended to document impacts and to guide adaptation and mitigation efforts. Research and observational strategies specifically aimed at improving our ability to predict and understand impacts, adaptive capacity, and societal and ecosystem vulnerabilities will serve both purposes and are the subject of the specific recommendations made in this paper.
Sarah J. Doherty, Stephan Bojinski, A. Henderson‐Sellers, Kevin J. Noone, David C. Goodrich, Nathaniel L. Bindoff, John A. Church, Kathy Hibbard, Thomas R. Karl, Lučka Kajfež-Bogataj, Amanda H. Lynch, D. E. Parker, I. Colin Prentice, V. Ramaswamy, Roger Saunders, Mark Stafford‐Smith, Konrad Steffen, Thomas F. Stocker, Peter Thorne, Kevin E Trenberth, Michel M. Verstraete, Francis W. Zwiers (2008). Lessons Learned from IPCC AR4: Scientific Developments Needed to Understand, Predict, and Respond to Climate Change. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(4), pp. 497-514, DOI: 10.1175/2008bams2643.1.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2008
Authors
22
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
DOI
10.1175/2008bams2643.1
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access