RDL logo
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
​
​
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Key concepts and a world‐wide look at plant recruitment networks

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
English
2024

Key concepts and a world‐wide look at plant recruitment networks

0 Datasets

0 Files

English
2024
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
DOI: 10.1111/brv.13177

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Alicia Ledo
Alicia Ledo

Freelance Scientist & Consultant

Verified
Julio M. Alcántara
Miguel Verdú
José Luis Hernando Garrido
+77 more

Abstract

Plant–plant interactions are major determinants of the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. There is a long tradition in the study of these interactions, their mechanisms and their consequences using experimental, observational and theoretical approaches. Empirical studies overwhelmingly focus at the level of species pairs or small sets of species. Although empirical data on these interactions at the community level are scarce, such studies have gained pace in the last decade. Studying plant–plant interactions at the community level requires knowledge of which species interact with which others, so an ecological networks approach must be incorporated into the basic toolbox of plant community ecology. The concept of recruitment networks (RNs) provides an integrative framework and new insights for many topics in the field of plant community ecology. RNs synthesise the set of canopy–recruit interactions in a local plant assemblage. Canopy–recruit interactions describe which (“canopy”) species allow the recruitment of other species in their vicinity and how. Here we critically review basic concepts of ecological network theory as they apply to RNs. We use RecruitNet, a recently published worldwide data set of canopy–recruit interactions, to describe RN patterns emerging at the interaction, species, and community levels, and relate them to different abiotic gradients. Our results show that RNs can be sampled with high accuracy. The studies included in RecruitNet show a very high mean network completeness (95%), indicating that undetected canopy–recruit pairs must be few and occur very infrequently. Across 351,064 canopy–recruit pairs analysed, the effect of the interaction on recruitment was neutral in an average of 69% of the interactions per community, but the remaining interactions were positive (i.e. facilitative) five times more often than negative (i.e. competitive), and positive interactions had twice the strength of negative ones. Moreover, the frequency and strength of facilitation increases along a climatic aridity gradient worldwide, so the demography of plant communities is increasingly strongly dependent on facilitation as aridity increases. At network level, species can be ascribed to four functional types depending on their position in the network: core, satellite, strict transients and disturbance‐dependent transients. This functional structure can allow a rough estimation of which species are more likely to persist. In RecruitNet communities, this functional structure most often departs from random null model expectation and could allow on average the persistence of 77% of the species in a local community. The functional structure of RNs also varies along the aridity gradient, but differently in shrubland than in forest communities. This variation suggests an increase in the probability of species persistence with aridity in forests, while such probability remains roughly constant along the gradient in shrublands. The different functional structure of RNs between forests and shrublands could contribute to explaining their co‐occurrence as alternative stable states of the vegetation under the same climatic conditions. This review is not exhaustive of all the topics that can be addressed using the framework of RNs, but instead aims to present some of the interesting insights that it can bring to the field of plant community ecology.

How to cite this publication

Julio M. Alcántara, Miguel Verdú, José Luis Hernando Garrido, Alicia Montesinos‐Navarro, Marcelo A. Aizen, Mohamed Alifriqui, David Allen, Ali A. Al‐Namazi, Cristina Armas, Jesús M. Bastida, Tono Bellido, Gustavo Brant Paterno, Herbert Briceño, Ricardo A. C. de Oliveira, Josefina G. Campoy, Ghassen Chaieb, Chengjin Chu, Elena Constantinou, Léo Delalandre, Milén Duarte, Michel Faife‐Cabrera, Fatih Fazlioglu, Edwino S. Fernando, Joel Flores, Hilda Flores‐Olvera, Ecaterina Fodor, Gislene Ganade, Marı́a B. Garcı́a, P. García‐Fayos, Sabrina S. Gavini, Marta Goberna, Lorena Gómez‐Aparicio, Enrique González‐Pendás, Ana González‐Robles, Kahraman İpekdal, Zaal Kikvidze, Alicia Ledo, Sandra Lendínez, Hanlun Liu, Francisco Lloret, Ramiro Pablo López, Álvaro López‐García, Christopher J. Lortie, Gianalberto Losapio, James A. Lutz, Frantíšek Máliš, Antonio J. Manzaneda, Vinícius Marcilio‐Silva, Richard Michalet, Rafael Molina‐Venegas, José A. Navarro‐Cano, Vojtěch Novotný, Jens M. Olesen, Juan Pablo Ortíz-Brunel, Mariona Pajares‐Murgó, Antonio J. Perea, Vidal Pérez‐Hernández, María Á. Pérez‐Navarro, Nuria Pistón, Iván Prieto, Jorge Prieto‐Rubio, Francisco I. Pugnaire, Nelson Ramírez, Rubén Retuerto, Pedro J. Rey, Daniel A. Rodriguez‐Ginart, Ricardo Sánchez‐Martín, Çağatay Tavşanoğlu, Giorgi Tedoradze, Amanda Tercero‐Araque, Katja Tielbörger, Blaise Touzard, İrem Tüfekcioğlu, Sevda Türkiş, Francisco M. Usero, Nurbahar Usta‐Baykal, Alfonso Valiente‐Banuet, Alexa Vargas‐Colin, Ioannis Ν. Vogiatzakis, Regino Zamora (2024). Key concepts and a world‐wide look at plant recruitment networks. Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, DOI: 10.1111/brv.13177.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2024

Authors

80

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

English

Journal

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

DOI

10.1111/brv.13177

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration