0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessYes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationSubstantial policy changes to control obesity, limit chronic disease, and reduce air pollution emissions, including greenhouse gasses, have been recommended. Transportation and planning policies that promote active travel by walking and cycling can contribute to these goals, potentially yielding further co-benefits. Little is known, however, about the interconnections among effects of policies considered, including potential unintended consequences. Objectives and methods: We review available literature regarding health impacts from policies that encourage active travel in the context of developing health impact assessment (HIA) models to help decision-makers propose better solutions for healthy environments. We identify important components of HIA models of modal shifts in active travel in response to transport policies and interventions. Results and discussion: Policies that increase active travel are likely to generate large individual health benefits through increases in physical activity for active travelers. Smaller, but population-wide benefits could accrue through reductions in air and noise pollution. Depending on conditions of policy implementations, risk tradeoffs are possible for some individuals who shift to active travel and consequently increase inhalation of air pollutants and exposure to traffic injuries. Well-designed policies may enhance health benefits through indirect outcomes such as improved social capital and diet, but these synergies are not sufficiently well understood to allow quantification at this time. Conclusion: Evaluating impacts of active travel policies is highly complex; however, many associations can be quantified. Identifying health-maximizing policies and conditions requires integrated HIAs. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.
Audrey de Nazelle, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Josep M Antó, Michael Bräuer, David Briggs, Charlotte Braun‐Fahrländer, Nick Cavill, Ashley R Cooper, Hélène Desqueyroux, Scott Fruin, Gerard Hoek, Luc Int Panis, Nicole Janssen, Michael Jerrett, Michael Joffe, Zorana Jovanovic Andersen, Elise van Kempen, Simon Kingham, Nadine Kubesch, Kevin M. Leyden, Julian Marshall, Jaume Matamala, Giorgos Mellios, Michelle A. Méndez, Hala Nassif, David Ogilvie, Rosana Peiró, Katherine Pérez, Ari Rabl, Martina S. Ragettli, Daniel A. Rodrı́guez, David Rojas, Pablo Ruiz-Rudolph, James Sallis, J. Terwoert, Jean‐François Toussaint, Jouni T. Tuomisto, Moniek Zuurbier, Erik Lebret (2011). Improving health through policies that promote active travel: A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2011
Authors
39
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access