RDL logo
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
​
​
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. How Often Should Dead-Reckoned Animal Movement Paths be Corrected for Drift?

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Preprint
en
2021

How Often Should Dead-Reckoned Animal Movement Paths be Corrected for Drift?

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-587959/v1

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Carlos M. Duarte
Carlos M. Duarte

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

Verified
Martin C. van Rooyen
Mads F. Bertelsen
Craig J. Tambling
+28 more

Abstract

Abstract Background Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System (GPS)) is typically used to verify an animal’s location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these ‘Verified Positions’ (VPs) so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal- and spatial resolution of the system’s measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear. Methods & Results Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion Panthera leo , the Red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda , the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus , and the Imperial cormorant Leucocarbo atriceps ). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy. Conclusions We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal-barrier interactions and foraging strategies.

How to cite this publication

Martin C. van Rooyen, Mads F. Bertelsen, Craig J. Tambling, Rory P. Wilson, Richard Gunner, Mark D. Holton, Mike D. Scantlebury, Phil Hopkins, Emily L. C. Shepard, Adam Fell, Baptiste Garde, Flavio Quintana, Agustina Gómez‐Laich, Ken Yoda, Takashi Yamamoto, Holly M. English, Sam M. Ferreira, Danny Govender, Pauli Viljoen, Angela Bruns, O. Louis van Schalkwyk, Nik C. Cole, Vikash Tatayah, Luca Börger, James Redcliffe, Stephen H. Bell, Nikki J. Marks, Nigel C. Bennett, Mariano H. Tonini, Hannah J. Williams, Carlos M. Duarte (2021). How Often Should Dead-Reckoned Animal Movement Paths be Corrected for Drift?. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-587959/v1.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Preprint

Year

2021

Authors

31

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-587959/v1

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access