0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract Background DNA methylation (DNAm) is a developmentally dynamic epigenetic process; yet, most epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have examined DNAm at only one timepoint or without systematic comparisons between timepoints. Thus, it is unclear whether DNAm alterations during certain developmental periods are more informative than others for health outcomes, how persistent epigenetic signals are across time, and whether epigenetic timing effects differ by outcome. Methods We applied longitudinal meta-regression models to published meta-analyses from the PACE consortium that examined DNAm at two timepoints—prospectively at birth and cross-sectionally in childhood—in relation to the same child outcome (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, sleep duration, BMI, asthma). These models allowed systematic comparisons of effect sizes and statistical significance between timepoints. Furthermore, we tested correlations between DNAm regression coefficients to assess the consistency of epigenetic signals across time and outcomes. Finally, we performed robustness checks, estimated between-study heterogeneity, and tested pathway enrichment. Results Our findings reveal three new insights: (i) across outcomes, DNAm effect sizes are consistently larger in childhood cross-sectional analyses compared to prospective analyses at birth; (ii) higher effect sizes do not necessarily translate into more significant findings, as associations also become noisier in childhood for most outcomes (showing larger standard errors in cross-sectional vs prospective analyses); and (iii) DNAm signals are highly time-specific, while also showing evidence of shared associations across health outcomes (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, and asthma). Notably, these observations could not be explained by sample size differences and only partly to differential study-heterogeneity. DNAm sites changing associations were enriched for neural pathways. Conclusions Our results highlight developmentally-specific associations between DNAm and child health outcomes, when assessing DNAm at birth vs childhood. This implies that EWAS results from one timepoint are unlikely to generalize to another. Longitudinal studies with repeated epigenetic assessments are direly needed to shed light on the dynamic relationship between DNAm, development and health, as well as to enable the creation of more reliable and generalizable epigenetic biomarkers. More broadly, this study underscores the importance of considering the time-varying nature of DNAm in epigenetic research and supports the potential existence of epigenetic “timing effects” on child health.
Alexander Neumann, Sara Sammallahti, Marta Cosín‐Tomás, Sarah E. Reese, Matthew Suderman, Silvia Alemany, Catarina Almqvist, Sandra Andrušaitytė, Syed Hasan Arshad, Marian J. Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Lawrence J. Beilin, Carrie V. Breton, Mariona Bustamante, Darina Czamara, Dana Dabelea, Celeste Eng, Brenda Eskenazi, Bernard F. Fuemmeler, Frank D. Gilliland, Regina Gražulevičienė, Siri E. Håberg, Gunda Herberth, Nina Holland, Amy Hough, Donglei Hu, Karen Huen, Anke Hüls, Paul M Ridker, Jianping Jin, Jordi Júlvez, Berthold Koletzko, Gerard H. Koppelman, Inger Kull, Xueling Lu, Léa Maître, Dan Mason, Erik Melén, Simon Kebede Merid, Peter L. Molloy, Trevor A. Mori, Rosa H. Mulder, Christian M. Page, Rebecca C. Richmond, Stefan Röder, Jason P. Ross, Laura Schellhas, Sylvain Sebért, Dean Sheppard, Harold Snieder, Anne P. Starling, Dan J. Stein, Gwen Tindula, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Judith M. Vonk, Esther Walton, Jonathan Witonsky, Cheng‐Jian Xu, Ivana V. Yang, Paul Yousefi, Heather J. Zar, Ana Claudia Zenclussen, Hongmei Zhang, Henning Tiemeier, Stephanie J. London, Janine F. Felix, Charlotte A. M. Cecil (2025). Epigenetic timing effects on child developmental outcomes: a longitudinal meta-regression of findings from the Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics Consortium. , 17(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-025-01451-7.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
66
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-025-01451-7
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access