0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free Access<p>Peatlands cover three percent of the global land surface. However, they store significant amounts of carbon (C), approximately 30%. Peatlands are drained to support agricultural production. It’s estimated that agriculture exploits approximately 20% of peatlands worldwide. The exploited peatlands are significant emitters of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). In Europe, agriculture is the second largest contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In addition to GHG emissions, we are fast losing productive peatlands; it’s estimated by 2050, a third of productive peatlands will be lost. Loss of productive peatlands will affect productivity and food security.</p><p>To prolong use of peatlands, ploughing in of crop residue, either from the previous season or specially grown crop, is often considered a mitigation option. Nevertheless, there is concern that fresh organic matter (FOM) might accelerate decomposition of existing organic. This study assesses effects of FOM on the emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>, methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and N<sub>2</sub>O in a cultivated peatland. A mesocosm experiment was carried out using intact cores with added FOM and manipulated water table (WT), -20 and -50 cm.</p><p>The results show there is an effect of both WT and FOM on emissions. CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions differ in the different WT treatments. The -20 cm cores produced more methane than the -50 cm.  It is evident that leaving crop residue and then ploughing it in does not have the desired effect as it led to increased emissions.</p>
Samuel Musarika, Davey L Jones, Dave Chadwick, Niall P. McNamara, Chris Evans (2020). Effects of crop residue on carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions on cultivated peat soils. , DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11148.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2020
Authors
5
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
DOI
10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11148
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access