0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThe transition to Cr(VI)-free production is a great challenge in the global aerospace industry that currently still relays on it for the preparation of aluminum for bonding. Proper surface pretreatment is a prerequisite for strong and durable adhesive joint. Despite decades of experience, the nature and contribution of the different adhesion forces between the aluminum and organic adhesive remain under discussion. Herein we studied the adhesion of epoxy resin as a function of the surface chemistry of barrier-type anodic oxides prepared in sulfuric acid (SAA), phosphoric acid (PAA), and mixtures of phosphoric–sulfuric acids (PSA) and chromic acid (CAA) at different anodizing temperatures. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data measured on model specimens were curve-fitted to calculate the relative amounts of O2–, OH–, PO43–, and SO42– species at the surface. The amounts of these species were then related to the mechanical performance of the joint measured by the floating roller peel test. Results show that significant initial adhesion is achieved without mechanical interlocking and independent of the type of electrolytes used for the pretreatment. Conversely, bonding stability under wet conditions is highly influenced by the surface chemistry. The wet adhesion strength increases with the hydroxyl concentration at the aluminum (oxide) surface, indicating that interfacial bonding is established through these surface hydroxyls. Phosphates and sulfates anions were not found to contribute to bonding with this type of adhesive.
Shoshan T. Abrahami, Tom Hauffman, John M. M. de Kok, J.M.C. Mol, Herman Terryn (2016). Effect of Anodic Aluminum Oxide Chemistry on Adhesive Bonding of Epoxy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 120(35), pp. 19670-19677, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04957.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2016
Authors
5
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
DOI
10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04957
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access