0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free Access<b>Aims</b> – Patients with Asthma COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) are an important clinical phenotype because they experience more exacerbations and may require different treatment. An important challenge is the definition of ACOS. Multiple, but inconsistent, definitions have been proposed. The aims of the present study are to assess the impact of various ACOS definitions on prevalence, patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. <b>Methods</b> – The Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study is a population based cohort study in men and women aged 45-65yrs. For the present analysis we included 5,784 individuals and a subpopulation of 864(15%) asthma/COPD patients. ACOS was defined according to six definitions, based on registry, questionnaires and lung function (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC and FENO). Differences in patient characteristics between definitions were assessed with regression analysis. Exacerbation rates during follow-up were compared. <b>Results</b> – Prevalence of ACOS in the asthma/COPD population ranged between 2.1 and 38.2%, depending on the definition. Agreement between registry-based and self-reported ACOS was 0.04, but increased to 0.40 when lung-function (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC<0.7) was added. Patient characteristics were similar, but asthma duration was longer with self-reported- compared with registry-based ACOS (mean difference: 22 (95% CI 12-33)yrs). Exacerbation rates were similar between self-reported- and registry-based ACOS (RR 1.24 (95% CI 0.94-1.64)). <b>Conclusion</b> – This study adds important knowledge about the agreement between different ACOS definitions. Given the low agreement between definitions and differences in prevalence, patient characteristics and clinical outcomes, consensus about the definition of ACOS is urgently needed.
Tobias Bonten, Marise J. Kasteleyn, Renée de Mutsert, Pieter Hiemstra, Frits R. Rosendaal, Niels H. Chavannes, Christian Taube (2016). Defining asthma COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS): A population based study. Epidemiology, pp. OA2005-OA2005, DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.oa2005.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2016
Authors
7
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Epidemiology
DOI
10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.oa2005
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access