0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free Accesspoints• Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been used for over 60 years in the treatment of malaria, amoebic liver abscess, and several rheumatological conditions, but their clinical pharmacology is not well understood.COVID-19 is a new potential indication, although these drugs have only moderate in vitro activity against the SARS-CoV-2 virus and there is no convincing evidence at this time of significant clinical efficacy.• Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine both have unusual pharmacokinetic properties with enormous apparent volumes of distribution (chloroquine > hydroxychloroquine) and very slow elimination from the body (terminal elimination half-lives > 1 month).• The free plasma concentrations that drive potentially serious adverse reactions (hypotension, cardiac conduction disturbances, delayed ventricular repolarization, and neurotoxicity) are determined largely by distribution processes.• Hydroxychloroquine was slightly safer than chloroquine in preclinical testing and is considered better tolerated over the long term.Both drugs are dangerous when overdosed, and parenteral administration needs careful control.• There are different salts, each with a different base equivalent.This has led to confusion and sometimes mistakes in dosing.As different salts are available in different places, malaria treatment is usually recommended in terms of base equivalent.Tablets of the two most widely available forms, chloroquine diphosphate 250 mg salt and hydroxychloroquine sulphate 200 mg salt, both contain 155 mg base.• The pro-arrhythmic and anti-arrhythmic effects of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been poorly characterised, although the majority of evidence for current regimens is very reassuring.Arrhythmia risks have been inferred from QT prolongation rather than observed.• We used available pharmacokinetic information from healthy volunteers, the treatment of malaria, the chronic treatment of rheumatological conditions, and the toxicokinetics
Sir Nicholas White, James A Watson, Richard M. Hoglund, Xin Hui S Chan, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Joel Tärning (2020). COVID-19 prevention and treatment: A critical analysis of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine clinical pharmacology. PLoS Medicine, 17(9), pp. e1003252-e1003252, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003252.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2020
Authors
6
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
PLoS Medicine
DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.1003252
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access