RDL logo
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
​
​
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
English
2015

Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents

0 Datasets

0 Files

English
2015
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Vol 8 (6)
DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.114.002230

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys

Imperial College London

Verified
Javaid Iqbal
Patrick W. Serruys
Sigmund Silber
+6 more

Abstract

Background— Newer-generation drug-eluting stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to be superior to the first-generation drug-eluting stents. However, data comparing long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus- (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are limited. RESOLUTE all-comers (Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial compared these 2 stents and has shown that ZES was noninferior to EES at 12-month for the primary end point of target lesion failure. We report the secondary clinical outcomes at the final 5-year follow-up of this trial. Methods and Results— RESOLUTE all-comer clinical study is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria. Patients (n=2292) were randomly assigned to treatment with either ZES (n=1140) or EES (n=1152). Patient-oriented composite end point (combination of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and any revascularizations), device-oriented composite end point (combination of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), and major adverse cardiac events (combination of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction, emergent coronary bypass surgery, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization) were analyzed at 5-year follow-up. The 2 groups were well-matched at baseline. Five-year follow-up data were available for 98% patients. There were no differences in patient-oriented composite end point (ZES 35.3% versus EES 32.0%, P =0.11), device-oriented composite end point (ZES 17.0% versus EES 16.2%, P =0.61), major adverse cardiac events (ZES 21.9% versus EES 21.6%, P =0.88), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ZES 2.8% versus EES 1.8%, P =0.12). Conclusions— At 5-year follow-up, ZES and EES had similar efficacy and safety in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00617084.

How to cite this publication

Javaid Iqbal, Patrick W. Serruys, Sigmund Silber, Henning Kelbæk, Gert Richardt, Marie‐Angèle Morel, Manuela Negoita, Paweł Buszman, Stephan Windecker (2015). Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions, 8(6), DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.114.002230.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2015

Authors

9

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

English

Journal

Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions

DOI

10.1161/circinterventions.114.002230

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access