0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessBackground— Newer-generation drug-eluting stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to be superior to the first-generation drug-eluting stents. However, data comparing long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus- (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are limited. RESOLUTE all-comers (Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial compared these 2 stents and has shown that ZES was noninferior to EES at 12-month for the primary end point of target lesion failure. We report the secondary clinical outcomes at the final 5-year follow-up of this trial. Methods and Results— RESOLUTE all-comer clinical study is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria. Patients (n=2292) were randomly assigned to treatment with either ZES (n=1140) or EES (n=1152). Patient-oriented composite end point (combination of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and any revascularizations), device-oriented composite end point (combination of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), and major adverse cardiac events (combination of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction, emergent coronary bypass surgery, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization) were analyzed at 5-year follow-up. The 2 groups were well-matched at baseline. Five-year follow-up data were available for 98% patients. There were no differences in patient-oriented composite end point (ZES 35.3% versus EES 32.0%, P =0.11), device-oriented composite end point (ZES 17.0% versus EES 16.2%, P =0.61), major adverse cardiac events (ZES 21.9% versus EES 21.6%, P =0.88), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ZES 2.8% versus EES 1.8%, P =0.12). Conclusions— At 5-year follow-up, ZES and EES had similar efficacy and safety in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00617084.
Javaid Iqbal, Patrick W. Serruys, Sigmund Silber, Henning Kelbæk, Gert Richardt, Marie‐Angèle Morel, Manuela Negoita, Paweł Buszman, Stephan Windecker (2015). Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions, 8(6), DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.114.002230.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2015
Authors
9
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
DOI
10.1161/circinterventions.114.002230
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access