0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessObjective To investigate in which way body mass index (BMI) and alignment affect the risk for knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression. Methods Radiographs of 181 knees from 155 patients (85% female, mean age 60 years) with radiographic signs of OA were analyzed at baseline and after 6 years. Progression was defined as 1-point increase in joint space narrowing score in the medial or lateral tibiofemoral (TF) compartment or having knee prosthesis during the follow-up for knees with a Kellgren and Lawrence score ≥1 at baseline. BMI at baseline was classified as normal (<25kg/m2), overweight (25–30) and obese (>30). Knee alignment on baseline radiographs was categorized as normal (TF angle between 182° and 184°) and malalignment (<182° or >184°). We estimated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval for knee OA progression for overweight and obese patients and for malaligned knees relative to normal using generalized estimating equations (GEE). Additionally, we estimated the added effect when BMI and malalignment were present together on progression of knee OA. Adjustments were made for age and sex. Results Seventy-six knees (42%) showed progression: 27 in lateral and 66 in medial compartment. Knees from overweight and obese patients had an increased risk for progression (RR 2.4 (1.–3.6) and 2.9 (1.7–4.1), respectively). RRs of progression for malaligned, varus and valgus knee were 2.0 (1.3–2.8), 2.3 (1.4–3.1), and 1.7 (0.97–2.6), respectively. When BMI and malalignment were included in one model, the effect of overweight, obesity and malalignment did not change. The added effect when overweight and malalignment were present was 17%. Conclusion Overweight is associated with progression of knee OA and shows a small interaction with alignment. Losing weight might be helpful in preventing the progression of knee OA.
Erlangga Yusuf, J. Bijsterbosch, P. Eline Slagboom, Frits R. Rosendaal, T. Huizinga, M. Kloppenburg (2011). Body mass index and alignment and their interaction as risk factors for progression of knees with radiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 19(9), pp. 1117-1122, DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.06.001.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2011
Authors
6
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
DOI
10.1016/j.joca.2011.06.001
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access